Georgia vs Mauritius: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Georgia
115.72 current US$
in 2020
Mauritius
100.26 current US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
70th
Mauritius rank
71st

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Georgia
  • Mauritius
0200400600800199520072020

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 115.72 current US$ against 100.26 current US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 15.46 current US$.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 70th and Mauritius ranks 71st of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 287.89 current US$ 144.11 current US$ 143.78 current US$ Georgia
2000s 54.81 current US$ 217.34 current US$ 162.53 current US$ Mauritius
2010s 427.2 current US$ 327.53 current US$ 99.67 current US$ Georgia
2020s 115.72 current US$ 100.26 current US$ 15.46 current US$ Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Georgia or Mauritius?
Georgia, at 115.72 current US$ against 100.26 current US$ in Mauritius as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Georgia and Mauritius?
15.46 current US$, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mauritius?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Georgia and Mauritius rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Georgia ranks 70th and Mauritius ranks 71st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Mauritius: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/georgia/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/georgia/mauritius/">Georgia vs Mauritius: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed