Finland vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and
Finland
233.59 current US$
in 2020
Sudan
255.06 current US$
in 2020
Finland rank
51st
Sudan rank
48th
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time
- Finland
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 255.06 current US$ against 233.59 current US$ in Finland, a difference of 21.47 current US$.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 51st and Sudan ranks 48th of 149 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 696.81 current US$ | 45.74 current US$ | 651.07 current US$ | Finland |
| 2020s | 233.59 current US$ | 255.06 current US$ | 21.46 current US$ | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Finland or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 255.06 current US$ against 233.59 current US$ in Finland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Finland and Sudan?
- 21.47 current US$, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
- Finland ranks 51st and Sudan ranks 48th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.