Estonia vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Estonia
478.3 current US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
448.74 current US$
in 2020
Estonia rank
30th
Papua New Guinea rank
32nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Estonia
  • Papua New Guinea
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199520072020

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 478.3 current US$ against 448.74 current US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 29.56 current US$.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Estonia ranks 30th and Papua New Guinea ranks 32nd of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 312.76 current US$ 509.57 current US$ 196.82 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 728.52 current US$ 183.31 current US$ 545.2 current US$ Estonia
2010s 1,485 current US$ 136.37 current US$ 1,349 current US$ Estonia
2020s 478.3 current US$ 448.74 current US$ 29.56 current US$ Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Estonia or Papua New Guinea?
Estonia, at 478.3 current US$ against 448.74 current US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Estonia and Papua New Guinea?
29.56 current US$, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Estonia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Estonia ranks 30th and Papua New Guinea ranks 32nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/estonia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/estonia/papua-new-guinea/">Estonia vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed