El Salvador vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

El Salvador
88.2 current US$
in 2020
Singapore
80.75 current US$
in 2020
El Salvador rank
78th
Singapore rank
79th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • El Salvador
  • Singapore
050100150200250199520072020

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 88.2 current US$ against 80.75 current US$ in Singapore, a difference of 7.45 current US$.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 78th and Singapore ranks 79th of 149 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 108.47 current US$ 0 current US$ 108.47 current US$ El Salvador
2000s 75.75 current US$ 0 current US$ 75.75 current US$ El Salvador
2010s 132.75 current US$ 7.36 current US$ 125.39 current US$ El Salvador
2020s 88.2 current US$ 80.75 current US$ 7.45 current US$ El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, El Salvador or Singapore?
El Salvador, at 88.2 current US$ against 80.75 current US$ in Singapore as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between El Salvador and Singapore?
7.45 current US$, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Singapore?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do El Salvador and Singapore rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
El Salvador ranks 78th and Singapore ranks 79th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/el-salvador/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/el-salvador/singapore/">El Salvador vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed