Croatia vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Croatia
1,023 current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
1,018 current US$
in 2020
Croatia rank
15th
Guinea-Bissau rank
16th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Croatia
  • Guinea-Bissau
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 1,023 current US$ against 1,018 current US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 5 current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 15th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 16th of 149 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 737.74 current US$ 559.29 current US$ 178.46 current US$ Croatia
2000s 986.17 current US$ 613.27 current US$ 372.9 current US$ Croatia
2010s 1,439 current US$ 356.97 current US$ 1,083 current US$ Croatia
2020s 1,023 current US$ 1,018 current US$ 4.8 current US$ Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Croatia or Guinea-Bissau?
Croatia, at 1,023 current US$ against 1,018 current US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Croatia and Guinea-Bissau?
5 current US$, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Croatia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Croatia ranks 15th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 16th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/croatia/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/croatia/guinea-bissau/">Croatia vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed