Chile vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Chile
39.39 current US$
in 2020
Namibia
45.78 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
94th
Namibia rank
92nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Chile
  • Namibia
02004006008001.0k199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 45.78 current US$ against 39.39 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 6.39 current US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Chile ranks 94th and Namibia ranks 92nd of 149 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 64.24 current US$ 953.13 current US$ 888.89 current US$ Namibia
2000s 77.15 current US$ 142.49 current US$ 65.34 current US$ Namibia
2010s 135.64 current US$ 147.54 current US$ 11.9 current US$ Namibia
2020s 39.39 current US$ 45.78 current US$ 6.39 current US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Chile or Namibia?
Namibia, at 45.78 current US$ against 39.39 current US$ in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Chile and Namibia?
6.39 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Chile and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Chile ranks 94th and Namibia ranks 92nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/chile/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/chile/namibia/">Chile vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed