Chile vs Jordan: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and
Chile
39.39 current US$
in 2020
Jordan
39.13 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
94th
Jordan rank
95th
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time
- Chile
- Jordan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 39.39 current US$ against 39.13 current US$ in Jordan, a difference of 0.26 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 94th and Jordan ranks 95th of 149 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.24 current US$ | 37.12 current US$ | 27.12 current US$ | Chile |
| 2000s | 77.15 current US$ | 53.11 current US$ | 24.04 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 135.64 current US$ | 75.25 current US$ | 60.39 current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 39.39 current US$ | 39.13 current US$ | 0.2577 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Chile or Jordan?
- Chile, at 39.39 current US$ against 39.13 current US$ in Jordan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Chile and Jordan?
- 0.26 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Jordan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Jordan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
- Chile ranks 94th and Jordan ranks 95th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.