Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Bosnia and Herzegovina
97.03 current US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe
90.44 current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
74th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
77th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 97.03 current US$ against 90.44 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 6.59 current US$.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 74th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 77th of 149 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 358.57 current US$ 75.57 current US$ 283 current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 98.65 current US$ 11.28 current US$ 87.38 current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 179.17 current US$ 57.35 current US$ 121.81 current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 97.03 current US$ 90.44 current US$ 6.59 current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Sao Tome and Principe?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 97.03 current US$ against 90.44 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sao Tome and Principe?
6.59 current US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 74th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 77th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/bosnia-and-herzegovina/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/bosnia-and-herzegovina/sao-tome-and-principe/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed