Belgium vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Belgium
474.46 current US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
448.74 current US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
31st
Papua New Guinea rank
32nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Belgium
  • Papua New Guinea
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 474.46 current US$ against 448.74 current US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 25.72 current US$.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Belgium ranks 31st and Papua New Guinea ranks 32nd of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 453.95 current US$ 509.57 current US$ 55.63 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 528.33 current US$ 183.31 current US$ 345.02 current US$ Belgium
2010s 619.04 current US$ 136.37 current US$ 482.67 current US$ Belgium
2020s 474.46 current US$ 448.74 current US$ 25.73 current US$ Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Belgium or Papua New Guinea?
Belgium, at 474.46 current US$ against 448.74 current US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Belgium and Papua New Guinea?
25.72 current US$, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belgium and Papua New Guinea rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Belgium ranks 31st and Papua New Guinea ranks 32nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/belgium/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/belgium/papua-new-guinea/">Belgium vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed