Serbia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Serbia
213.15 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Trinidad and Tobago
232.49 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
69th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
67th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Serbia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0100200300199520072020

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 232.49 real chained 2019 US$ against 213.15 real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia, a difference of 19.34 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Serbia ranks 69th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 67th of 151 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2000s 195.63 real chained 2019 US$ 259.02 real chained 2019 US$ 63.39 real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 206.49 real chained 2019 US$ 244.62 real chained 2019 US$ 38.13 real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 213.15 real chained 2019 US$ 232.49 real chained 2019 US$ 19.34 real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Serbia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 232.49 real chained 2019 US$ against 213.15 real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Serbia and Trinidad and Tobago?
19.34 real chained 2019 US$, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Trinidad and Tobago?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Serbia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Serbia ranks 69th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 67th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/serbia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/serbia/trinidad-and-tobago/">Serbia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed