Papua New Guinea vs Türkiye: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Papua New Guinea
439.58 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Türkiye
367.71 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea rank
50th
Türkiye rank
52nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Türkiye
02004006008001.0k199520072020

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 439.58 real chained 2019 US$ against 367.71 real chained 2019 US$ in Türkiye, a difference of 71.87 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Türkiye's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 50th and Türkiye ranks 52nd of 151 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Türkiye Difference Ahead
1990s 876.53 real chained 2019 US$ 451.57 real chained 2019 US$ 424.96 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 681.39 real chained 2019 US$ 416.91 real chained 2019 US$ 264.49 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 505.44 real chained 2019 US$ 382.74 real chained 2019 US$ 122.71 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 439.58 real chained 2019 US$ 367.71 real chained 2019 US$ 71.87 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Papua New Guinea or Türkiye?
Papua New Guinea, at 439.58 real chained 2019 US$ against 367.71 real chained 2019 US$ in Türkiye as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Papua New Guinea and Türkiye?
71.87 real chained 2019 US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Türkiye?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Papua New Guinea and Türkiye rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Papua New Guinea ranks 50th and Türkiye ranks 52nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Türkiye: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/papua-new-guinea/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/papua-new-guinea/turkiye/">Papua New Guinea vs Türkiye: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed