Norway vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Norway
962.69 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zambia
829.08 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Norway rank
21st
Zambia rank
24th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Norway
  • Zambia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Norway currently reports 962.69 real chained 2019 US$ against 829.08 real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia, a difference of 133.61 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.

Norway ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 24th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,169 real chained 2019 US$ 1,809 real chained 2019 US$ 639.71 real chained 2019 US$ Zambia
2000s 1,113 real chained 2019 US$ 1,445 real chained 2019 US$ 331.83 real chained 2019 US$ Zambia
2010s 1,004 real chained 2019 US$ 1,011 real chained 2019 US$ 7.03 real chained 2019 US$ Zambia
2020s 962.69 real chained 2019 US$ 829.08 real chained 2019 US$ 133.61 real chained 2019 US$ Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Norway or Zambia?
Norway, at 962.69 real chained 2019 US$ against 829.08 real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Norway and Zambia?
133.61 real chained 2019 US$, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Zambia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Norway and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Norway ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 24th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/norway/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/norway/zambia/">Norway vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed