Nicaragua vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Nicaragua
426.07 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
439.58 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Nicaragua rank
51st
Papua New Guinea rank
50th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Papua New Guinea
02505007501.0k199520072020

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 439.58 real chained 2019 US$ against 426.07 real chained 2019 US$ in Nicaragua, a difference of 13.51 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 51st and Papua New Guinea ranks 50th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 985.49 real chained 2019 US$ 876.53 real chained 2019 US$ 108.95 real chained 2019 US$ Nicaragua
2000s 757.79 real chained 2019 US$ 681.39 real chained 2019 US$ 76.39 real chained 2019 US$ Nicaragua
2010s 527.57 real chained 2019 US$ 505.44 real chained 2019 US$ 22.13 real chained 2019 US$ Nicaragua
2020s 426.07 real chained 2019 US$ 439.58 real chained 2019 US$ 13.51 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Nicaragua or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 439.58 real chained 2019 US$ against 426.07 real chained 2019 US$ in Nicaragua as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Nicaragua and Papua New Guinea?
13.51 real chained 2019 US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Nicaragua and Papua New Guinea rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Nicaragua ranks 51st and Papua New Guinea ranks 50th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/nicaragua/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/nicaragua/papua-new-guinea/">Nicaragua vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed