New Zealand vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

New Zealand
9,101 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sweden
3,215 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
New Zealand rank
1st
Sweden rank
3rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • New Zealand
  • Sweden
4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k199520072020

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 9,101 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,215 real chained 2019 US$ in Sweden, a difference of 5,886 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 2.8 times Sweden's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 3rd of 151 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 12,068 real chained 2019 US$ 3,784 real chained 2019 US$ 8,284 real chained 2019 US$ New Zealand
2000s 11,291 real chained 2019 US$ 3,701 real chained 2019 US$ 7,590 real chained 2019 US$ New Zealand
2010s 10,024 real chained 2019 US$ 3,408 real chained 2019 US$ 6,616 real chained 2019 US$ New Zealand
2020s 9,101 real chained 2019 US$ 3,215 real chained 2019 US$ 5,886 real chained 2019 US$ New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, New Zealand or Sweden?
New Zealand, at 9,101 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,215 real chained 2019 US$ in Sweden as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between New Zealand and Sweden?
5,886 real chained 2019 US$, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sweden?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do New Zealand and Sweden rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
New Zealand ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 3rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/new-zealand/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/new-zealand/sweden/">New Zealand vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed