Lithuania vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Lithuania
1,401 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Montenegro
1,510 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Lithuania rank
12th
Montenegro rank
11th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Lithuania
  • Montenegro
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 1,510 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,401 real chained 2019 US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 109 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 12th and Montenegro ranks 11th of 151 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 1,191 real chained 2019 US$ 1,446 real chained 2019 US$ 255.46 real chained 2019 US$ Montenegro
2010s 1,333 real chained 2019 US$ 1,510 real chained 2019 US$ 176.41 real chained 2019 US$ Montenegro
2020s 1,401 real chained 2019 US$ 1,510 real chained 2019 US$ 108.79 real chained 2019 US$ Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Lithuania or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 1,510 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,401 real chained 2019 US$ in Lithuania as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Lithuania and Montenegro?
109 real chained 2019 US$, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Montenegro?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Lithuania and Montenegro rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Lithuania ranks 12th and Montenegro ranks 11th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/lithuania/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/lithuania/montenegro/">Lithuania vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed