Kyrgyzstan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and
Kyrgyzstan
80.21 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe
87.03 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
99th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
98th
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 87.03 real chained 2019 US$ against 80.21 real chained 2019 US$ in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 6.82 real chained 2019 US$.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 99th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 98th of 151 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 99.73 real chained 2019 US$ | 155.85 real chained 2019 US$ | 56.12 real chained 2019 US$ | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2000s | 94.08 real chained 2019 US$ | 134.08 real chained 2019 US$ | 40 real chained 2019 US$ | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 85.26 real chained 2019 US$ | 102.41 real chained 2019 US$ | 17.15 real chained 2019 US$ | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 80.21 real chained 2019 US$ | 87.03 real chained 2019 US$ | 6.82 real chained 2019 US$ | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Kyrgyzstan or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 87.03 real chained 2019 US$ against 80.21 real chained 2019 US$ in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Kyrgyzstan and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 6.82 real chained 2019 US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 99th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 98th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.