Kyrgyzstan vs Russian Federation: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Kyrgyzstan
80.21 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Russian Federation
87.23 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
99th
Russian Federation rank
96th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Russian Federation
0255075100199520072020

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 87.23 real chained 2019 US$ against 80.21 real chained 2019 US$ in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 7.02 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 99th and Russian Federation ranks 96th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Russian Federation in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 99.73 real chained 2019 US$ 85.04 real chained 2019 US$ 14.69 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2000s 94.08 real chained 2019 US$ 87.54 real chained 2019 US$ 6.54 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2010s 85.26 real chained 2019 US$ 87.78 real chained 2019 US$ 2.52 real chained 2019 US$ Russian Federation
2020s 80.21 real chained 2019 US$ 87.23 real chained 2019 US$ 7.02 real chained 2019 US$ Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Kyrgyzstan or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 87.23 real chained 2019 US$ against 80.21 real chained 2019 US$ in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Kyrgyzstan and Russian Federation?
7.02 real chained 2019 US$, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Russian Federation?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Russian Federation rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 99th and Russian Federation ranks 96th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Russian Federation: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/kyrgyz-republic/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/kyrgyz-republic/russian-federation/">Kyrgyzstan vs Russian Federation: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed