Kyrgyzstan vs Philippines: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Kyrgyzstan
80.21 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Philippines
75.43 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
99th
Philippines rank
102nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Philippines
050100150199520072020

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 80.21 real chained 2019 US$ against 75.43 real chained 2019 US$ in Philippines, a difference of 4.78 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Philippines ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 99th and Philippines ranks 102nd of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Philippines Difference Ahead
1990s 99.73 real chained 2019 US$ 120.76 real chained 2019 US$ 21.03 real chained 2019 US$ Philippines
2000s 94.08 real chained 2019 US$ 98.21 real chained 2019 US$ 4.14 real chained 2019 US$ Philippines
2010s 85.26 real chained 2019 US$ 80.6 real chained 2019 US$ 4.66 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2020s 80.21 real chained 2019 US$ 75.43 real chained 2019 US$ 4.79 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Kyrgyzstan or Philippines?
Kyrgyzstan, at 80.21 real chained 2019 US$ against 75.43 real chained 2019 US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Kyrgyzstan and Philippines?
4.78 real chained 2019 US$, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Philippines?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Philippines rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 99th and Philippines ranks 102nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Philippines: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/kyrgyz-republic/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/kyrgyz-republic/philippines/">Kyrgyzstan vs Philippines: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed