Iceland vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Iceland
142.19 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
131.79 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Iceland rank
80th
Namibia rank
82nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Iceland
  • Namibia
100150200250199520072020

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 142.19 real chained 2019 US$ against 131.79 real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia, a difference of 10.4 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Iceland ranks 80th and Namibia ranks 82nd of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 97.01 real chained 2019 US$ 241.91 real chained 2019 US$ 144.9 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 123.8 real chained 2019 US$ 196.76 real chained 2019 US$ 72.96 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2010s 145.37 real chained 2019 US$ 153.81 real chained 2019 US$ 8.44 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2020s 142.19 real chained 2019 US$ 131.79 real chained 2019 US$ 10.4 real chained 2019 US$ Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Iceland or Namibia?
Iceland, at 142.19 real chained 2019 US$ against 131.79 real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Iceland and Namibia?
10.4 real chained 2019 US$, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Iceland ranks 80th and Namibia ranks 82nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/iceland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/iceland/namibia/">Iceland vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed