Guinea vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Guinea
0.5753 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malawi
2.31 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea rank
145th
Malawi rank
142nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Guinea
  • Malawi
0246199520072020

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 2.31 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.5753 real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea, a difference of 1.73 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Malawi's figure about 4.0 times Guinea's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 145th and Malawi ranks 142nd of 151 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 1.1 real chained 2019 US$ 6.09 real chained 2019 US$ 4.99 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2000s 0.9177 real chained 2019 US$ 4.6 real chained 2019 US$ 3.69 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2010s 0.6866 real chained 2019 US$ 2.98 real chained 2019 US$ 2.29 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2020s 0.5753 real chained 2019 US$ 2.31 real chained 2019 US$ 1.73 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Guinea or Malawi?
Malawi, at 2.31 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.5753 real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Guinea and Malawi?
1.73 real chained 2019 US$, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Malawi?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea and Malawi rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Guinea ranks 145th and Malawi ranks 142nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/guinea/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/guinea/malawi/">Guinea vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed