Guinea-Bissau vs Mozambique: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Guinea-Bissau
6.87 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mozambique
7.59 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
135th
Mozambique rank
134th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Mozambique
051015199520072020

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 7.59 real chained 2019 US$ against 6.87 real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.72 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th and Mozambique ranks 134th of 151 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Mozambique Difference Ahead
1990s 13.1 real chained 2019 US$ 16.38 real chained 2019 US$ 3.28 real chained 2019 US$ Mozambique
2000s 10.84 real chained 2019 US$ 13.03 real chained 2019 US$ 2.19 real chained 2019 US$ Mozambique
2010s 8.07 real chained 2019 US$ 9.31 real chained 2019 US$ 1.24 real chained 2019 US$ Mozambique
2020s 6.87 real chained 2019 US$ 7.59 real chained 2019 US$ 0.723 real chained 2019 US$ Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Guinea-Bissau or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 7.59 real chained 2019 US$ against 6.87 real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Guinea-Bissau and Mozambique?
0.72 real chained 2019 US$, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Mozambique?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Mozambique rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th and Mozambique ranks 134th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Mozambique: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/guinea-bissau/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/guinea-bissau/mozambique/">Guinea-Bissau vs Mozambique: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed