Guinea-Bissau vs Malta: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Guinea-Bissau
6.87 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malta
5.78 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
135th
Malta rank
137th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Malta
051015199520072020

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 6.87 real chained 2019 US$ against 5.78 real chained 2019 US$ in Malta, a difference of 1.09 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th and Malta ranks 137th of 151 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 13.1 real chained 2019 US$ 5.93 real chained 2019 US$ 7.17 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 10.84 real chained 2019 US$ 5.65 real chained 2019 US$ 5.2 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 8.07 real chained 2019 US$ 5.52 real chained 2019 US$ 2.55 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 6.87 real chained 2019 US$ 5.78 real chained 2019 US$ 1.09 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Guinea-Bissau or Malta?
Guinea-Bissau, at 6.87 real chained 2019 US$ against 5.78 real chained 2019 US$ in Malta as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Guinea-Bissau and Malta?
1.09 real chained 2019 US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Malta?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Malta rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th and Malta ranks 137th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Malta: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/guinea-bissau/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/guinea-bissau/malta/">Guinea-Bissau vs Malta: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed