Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Eswatini
8.93 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
13.34 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Eswatini rank
132nd
Zimbabwe rank
131st

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Eswatini
  • Zimbabwe
05101520199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 13.34 real chained 2019 US$ against 8.93 real chained 2019 US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 4.41 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.5 times Eswatini's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 132nd and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 151 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 10.07 real chained 2019 US$ 19.52 real chained 2019 US$ 9.45 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 9.51 real chained 2019 US$ 17.81 real chained 2019 US$ 8.3 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 9.19 real chained 2019 US$ 15.17 real chained 2019 US$ 5.98 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 8.93 real chained 2019 US$ 13.34 real chained 2019 US$ 4.41 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Eswatini or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 13.34 real chained 2019 US$ against 8.93 real chained 2019 US$ in Eswatini as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
4.41 real chained 2019 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Eswatini and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Eswatini ranks 132nd and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/eswatini/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/eswatini/zimbabwe/">Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed