Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and
Eswatini
8.93 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
6.87 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Eswatini rank
132nd
Guinea-Bissau rank
135th
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time
- Eswatini
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 8.93 real chained 2019 US$ against 6.87 real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 2.06 real chained 2019 US$.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Guinea-Bissau's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Eswatini ranks 132nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.07 real chained 2019 US$ | 13.1 real chained 2019 US$ | 3.03 real chained 2019 US$ | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 9.51 real chained 2019 US$ | 10.84 real chained 2019 US$ | 1.33 real chained 2019 US$ | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 9.19 real chained 2019 US$ | 8.07 real chained 2019 US$ | 1.12 real chained 2019 US$ | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 8.93 real chained 2019 US$ | 6.87 real chained 2019 US$ | 2.06 real chained 2019 US$ | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Eswatini or Guinea-Bissau?
- Eswatini, at 8.93 real chained 2019 US$ against 6.87 real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
- 2.06 real chained 2019 US$, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
- Eswatini ranks 132nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.