Ecuador vs Kazakhstan: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Ecuador
95.14 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kazakhstan
91.12 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
91st
Kazakhstan rank
93rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Ecuador
  • Kazakhstan
050100150199520072020

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 95.14 real chained 2019 US$ against 91.12 real chained 2019 US$ in Kazakhstan, a difference of 4.02 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 91st and Kazakhstan ranks 93rd of 151 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 156.52 real chained 2019 US$ 101.86 real chained 2019 US$ 54.66 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2000s 131.86 real chained 2019 US$ 101.51 real chained 2019 US$ 30.35 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2010s 106.82 real chained 2019 US$ 92.9 real chained 2019 US$ 13.92 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2020s 95.14 real chained 2019 US$ 91.12 real chained 2019 US$ 4.03 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Ecuador or Kazakhstan?
Ecuador, at 95.14 real chained 2019 US$ against 91.12 real chained 2019 US$ in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Ecuador and Kazakhstan?
4.02 real chained 2019 US$, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kazakhstan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Kazakhstan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Ecuador ranks 91st and Kazakhstan ranks 93rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Kazakhstan: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/ecuador/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/ecuador/kazakhstan/">Ecuador vs Kazakhstan: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed