Congo vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Congo
1,379 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Montenegro
1,510 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo rank
13th
Montenegro rank
11th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Congo
  • Montenegro
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520072020

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 1,510 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,379 real chained 2019 US$ in Congo, a difference of 131 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 13th and Montenegro ranks 11th of 151 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 1,933 real chained 2019 US$ 1,446 real chained 2019 US$ 486.9 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2010s 1,584 real chained 2019 US$ 1,510 real chained 2019 US$ 74.53 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2020s 1,379 real chained 2019 US$ 1,510 real chained 2019 US$ 130.33 real chained 2019 US$ Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Congo or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 1,510 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,379 real chained 2019 US$ in Congo as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Congo and Montenegro?
131 real chained 2019 US$, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Montenegro?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Congo and Montenegro rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Congo ranks 13th and Montenegro ranks 11th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/congo-rep/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/congo-rep/montenegro/">Congo vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed