Congo vs Estonia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Congo
1,379 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Estonia
1,277 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo rank
13th
Estonia rank
16th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Congo
  • Estonia
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520072020

How they compare

Congo currently reports 1,379 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,277 real chained 2019 US$ in Estonia, a difference of 102 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 13th and Estonia ranks 16th of 151 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 2,772 real chained 2019 US$ 1,105 real chained 2019 US$ 1,668 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2000s 2,197 real chained 2019 US$ 1,168 real chained 2019 US$ 1,028 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2010s 1,584 real chained 2019 US$ 1,266 real chained 2019 US$ 318.46 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2020s 1,379 real chained 2019 US$ 1,277 real chained 2019 US$ 102.18 real chained 2019 US$ Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Congo or Estonia?
Congo, at 1,379 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,277 real chained 2019 US$ in Estonia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Congo and Estonia?
102 real chained 2019 US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Estonia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Congo and Estonia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Congo ranks 13th and Estonia ranks 16th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Estonia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/congo-rep/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/congo-rep/estonia/">Congo vs Estonia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed