Chile vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Chile
125.75 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
131.79 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chile rank
83rd
Namibia rank
82nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Chile
  • Namibia
0100200300199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 131.79 real chained 2019 US$ against 125.75 real chained 2019 US$ in Chile, a difference of 6.04 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 83rd and Namibia ranks 82nd of 151 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 140.89 real chained 2019 US$ 241.91 real chained 2019 US$ 101.02 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 134.41 real chained 2019 US$ 196.76 real chained 2019 US$ 62.35 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2010s 130.19 real chained 2019 US$ 153.81 real chained 2019 US$ 23.63 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2020s 125.75 real chained 2019 US$ 131.79 real chained 2019 US$ 6.05 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Chile or Namibia?
Namibia, at 131.79 real chained 2019 US$ against 125.75 real chained 2019 US$ in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Chile and Namibia?
6.04 real chained 2019 US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Chile and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Chile ranks 83rd and Namibia ranks 82nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/chile/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/chile/namibia/">Chile vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed