Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mali: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Bosnia and Herzegovina
271.38 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mali
251.93 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
62nd
Mali rank
64th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Mali
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 271.38 real chained 2019 US$ against 251.93 real chained 2019 US$ in Mali, a difference of 19.45 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mali ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 62nd and Mali ranks 64th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Mali Difference Ahead
1990s 220.98 real chained 2019 US$ 515.21 real chained 2019 US$ 294.24 real chained 2019 US$ Mali
2000s 212.35 real chained 2019 US$ 413.82 real chained 2019 US$ 201.47 real chained 2019 US$ Mali
2010s 249.29 real chained 2019 US$ 300.67 real chained 2019 US$ 51.38 real chained 2019 US$ Mali
2020s 271.38 real chained 2019 US$ 251.93 real chained 2019 US$ 19.45 real chained 2019 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Mali?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 271.38 real chained 2019 US$ against 251.93 real chained 2019 US$ in Mali as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mali?
19.45 real chained 2019 US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mali?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mali rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 62nd and Mali ranks 64th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mali: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mali/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mali: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed