Australia vs Congo: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Australia
1,374 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo
1,379 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Australia rank
14th
Congo rank
13th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Australia
  • Congo
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520072020

How they compare

Congo currently reports 1,379 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,374 real chained 2019 US$ in Australia, a difference of 5 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 14th and Congo ranks 13th of 151 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 1,892 real chained 2019 US$ 2,772 real chained 2019 US$ 879.7 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2000s 1,708 real chained 2019 US$ 2,197 real chained 2019 US$ 488.82 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2010s 1,474 real chained 2019 US$ 1,584 real chained 2019 US$ 109.81 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2020s 1,374 real chained 2019 US$ 1,379 real chained 2019 US$ 5.07 real chained 2019 US$ Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Australia or Congo?
Congo, at 1,379 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,374 real chained 2019 US$ in Australia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Australia and Congo?
5 real chained 2019 US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Congo rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Australia ranks 14th and Congo ranks 13th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Congo: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/australia/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/australia/congo-rep/">Australia vs Congo: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed