Armenia vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Armenia
278.92 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina
271.38 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Armenia rank
61st
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
62nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Armenia
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
0100200300199520072020

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 278.92 real chained 2019 US$ against 271.38 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 7.54 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 61st and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 62nd of 151 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
1990s 242.99 real chained 2019 US$ 220.98 real chained 2019 US$ 22.02 real chained 2019 US$ Armenia
2000s 258.5 real chained 2019 US$ 212.35 real chained 2019 US$ 46.15 real chained 2019 US$ Armenia
2010s 272.38 real chained 2019 US$ 249.29 real chained 2019 US$ 23.1 real chained 2019 US$ Armenia
2020s 278.92 real chained 2019 US$ 271.38 real chained 2019 US$ 7.54 real chained 2019 US$ Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Armenia or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Armenia, at 278.92 real chained 2019 US$ against 271.38 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
7.54 real chained 2019 US$, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Armenia ranks 61st and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 62nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/armenia/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/armenia/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Armenia vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed