Angola vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Angola
8.61 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
13.34 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Angola rank
133rd
Zimbabwe rank
131st

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Angola
  • Zimbabwe
0510152025199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 13.34 real chained 2019 US$ against 8.61 real chained 2019 US$ in Angola, a difference of 4.73 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.5 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 133rd and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 22.77 real chained 2019 US$ 19.52 real chained 2019 US$ 3.24 real chained 2019 US$ Angola
2000s 17.11 real chained 2019 US$ 17.81 real chained 2019 US$ 0.7049 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 11.01 real chained 2019 US$ 15.17 real chained 2019 US$ 4.16 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 8.61 real chained 2019 US$ 13.34 real chained 2019 US$ 4.72 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Angola or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 13.34 real chained 2019 US$ against 8.61 real chained 2019 US$ in Angola as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Angola and Zimbabwe?
4.73 real chained 2019 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Angola and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Angola ranks 133rd and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/angola/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/angola/zimbabwe/">Angola vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed