Angola vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Angola
8.61 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
6.87 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Angola rank
133rd
Guinea-Bissau rank
135th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Angola
  • Guinea-Bissau
510152025199520072020

How they compare

Angola currently reports 8.61 real chained 2019 US$ against 6.87 real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 1.74 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.3 times Guinea-Bissau's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 133rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th of 151 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 22.77 real chained 2019 US$ 13.1 real chained 2019 US$ 9.67 real chained 2019 US$ Angola
2000s 17.11 real chained 2019 US$ 10.84 real chained 2019 US$ 6.27 real chained 2019 US$ Angola
2010s 11.01 real chained 2019 US$ 8.07 real chained 2019 US$ 2.94 real chained 2019 US$ Angola
2020s 8.61 real chained 2019 US$ 6.87 real chained 2019 US$ 1.74 real chained 2019 US$ Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Angola or Guinea-Bissau?
Angola, at 8.61 real chained 2019 US$ against 6.87 real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Angola and Guinea-Bissau?
1.74 real chained 2019 US$, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Angola and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Angola ranks 133rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/angola/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real/angola/guinea-bissau/">Angola vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed