Romania vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Romania
0.3291 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sudan
0.1123 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Romania rank
112th
Sudan rank
113th

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Romania
  • Sudan
0.10.20.30.4199520072020

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.3291 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.1123 real chained 2019 US$ in Sudan, a difference of 0.2168 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Romania's figure about 2.9 times Sudan's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Romania ranks 112th and Sudan ranks 113th of 151 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.3628 real chained 2019 US$ 0.145 real chained 2019 US$ 0.2179 real chained 2019 US$ Romania
2020s 0.3291 real chained 2019 US$ 0.1123 real chained 2019 US$ 0.2168 real chained 2019 US$ Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Romania or Sudan?
Romania, at 0.3291 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.1123 real chained 2019 US$ in Sudan as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Romania and Sudan?
0.2168 real chained 2019 US$, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Sudan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
How do Romania and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Romania ranks 112th and Sudan ranks 113th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/romania/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/romania/sudan/">Romania vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.