Panama vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Panama
94.23 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Uruguay
101.45 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Panama rank
28th
Uruguay rank
26th

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Panama
  • Uruguay
050100150200199520072020

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 101.45 real chained 2019 US$ against 94.23 real chained 2019 US$ in Panama, a difference of 7.22 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 28th and Uruguay ranks 26th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 173 real chained 2019 US$ 112.54 real chained 2019 US$ 60.46 real chained 2019 US$ Panama
2000s 131.19 real chained 2019 US$ 102.99 real chained 2019 US$ 28.19 real chained 2019 US$ Panama
2010s 98.49 real chained 2019 US$ 103.33 real chained 2019 US$ 4.84 real chained 2019 US$ Uruguay
2020s 94.23 real chained 2019 US$ 101.45 real chained 2019 US$ 7.22 real chained 2019 US$ Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Panama or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 101.45 real chained 2019 US$ against 94.23 real chained 2019 US$ in Panama as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Panama and Uruguay?
7.22 real chained 2019 US$, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Uruguay?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Panama and Uruguay rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Panama ranks 28th and Uruguay ranks 26th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/panama/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/panama/uruguay/">Panama vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.