Montenegro vs Ukraine: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Montenegro
2.45 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ukraine
3.52 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Montenegro rank
101st
Ukraine rank
98th

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Montenegro
  • Ukraine
012345199520072020

How they compare

Ukraine currently reports 3.52 real chained 2019 US$ against 2.45 real chained 2019 US$ in Montenegro, a difference of 1.07 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.4 times Montenegro's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.

Montenegro ranks 101st and Ukraine ranks 98th of 151 countries.

Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Ukraine Difference Ahead
2000s 2.78 real chained 2019 US$ 4.35 real chained 2019 US$ 1.58 real chained 2019 US$ Ukraine
2010s 2.65 real chained 2019 US$ 3.96 real chained 2019 US$ 1.32 real chained 2019 US$ Ukraine
2020s 2.45 real chained 2019 US$ 3.52 real chained 2019 US$ 1.08 real chained 2019 US$ Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Montenegro or Ukraine?
Ukraine, at 3.52 real chained 2019 US$ against 2.45 real chained 2019 US$ in Montenegro as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Montenegro and Ukraine?
1.07 real chained 2019 US$, with Ukraine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Ukraine?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Montenegro and Ukraine rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Montenegro ranks 101st and Ukraine ranks 98th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montenegro vs Ukraine: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/montenegro/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/montenegro/ukraine/">Montenegro vs Ukraine: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.