Mauritius vs Sierra Leone: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Mauritius
51.05 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sierra Leone
47.2 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mauritius rank
43rd
Sierra Leone rank
46th

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sierra Leone
050100150199520072020

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 51.05 real chained 2019 US$ against 47.2 real chained 2019 US$ in Sierra Leone, a difference of 3.85 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Mauritius ranks 43rd and Sierra Leone ranks 46th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1990s 97.11 real chained 2019 US$ 128.77 real chained 2019 US$ 31.65 real chained 2019 US$ Sierra Leone
2000s 77.65 real chained 2019 US$ 92.93 real chained 2019 US$ 15.28 real chained 2019 US$ Sierra Leone
2010s 59.22 real chained 2019 US$ 59.87 real chained 2019 US$ 0.6501 real chained 2019 US$ Sierra Leone
2020s 51.05 real chained 2019 US$ 47.2 real chained 2019 US$ 3.84 real chained 2019 US$ Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Mauritius or Sierra Leone?
Mauritius, at 51.05 real chained 2019 US$ against 47.2 real chained 2019 US$ in Sierra Leone as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Mauritius and Sierra Leone?
3.85 real chained 2019 US$, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sierra Leone?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mauritius and Sierra Leone rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Mauritius ranks 43rd and Sierra Leone ranks 46th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sierra Leone: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/mauritius/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/mauritius/sierra-leone/">Mauritius vs Sierra Leone: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.