Malta vs Oman: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Malta
376.45 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Oman
317.27 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malta rank
6th
Oman rank
7th

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Malta
  • Oman
4006008001.0k1.2k199520072020

How they compare

Malta currently reports 376.45 real chained 2019 US$ against 317.27 real chained 2019 US$ in Oman, a difference of 59.18 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Oman's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Oman ahead.

Malta ranks 6th and Oman ranks 7th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and Oman in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Oman Difference Ahead
1990s 665.51 real chained 2019 US$ 1,107 real chained 2019 US$ 441.58 real chained 2019 US$ Oman
2000s 562.61 real chained 2019 US$ 847.33 real chained 2019 US$ 284.72 real chained 2019 US$ Oman
2010s 466.07 real chained 2019 US$ 433.48 real chained 2019 US$ 32.59 real chained 2019 US$ Malta
2020s 376.45 real chained 2019 US$ 317.27 real chained 2019 US$ 59.19 real chained 2019 US$ Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Malta or Oman?
Malta, at 376.45 real chained 2019 US$ against 317.27 real chained 2019 US$ in Oman as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Malta and Oman?
59.18 real chained 2019 US$, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Oman?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Malta and Oman rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Malta ranks 6th and Oman ranks 7th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Oman: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/malta/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/malta/oman/">Malta vs Oman: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.