Lithuania vs Poland: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Lithuania
24.16 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Poland
22.9 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Lithuania rank
66th
Poland rank
69th

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Lithuania
  • Poland
0102030199520072020

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 24.16 real chained 2019 US$ against 22.9 real chained 2019 US$ in Poland, a difference of 1.26 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Poland ahead.

Lithuania ranks 66th and Poland ranks 69th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 23.85 real chained 2019 US$ 28.38 real chained 2019 US$ 4.53 real chained 2019 US$ Poland
2000s 23.11 real chained 2019 US$ 25.96 real chained 2019 US$ 2.85 real chained 2019 US$ Poland
2010s 24.53 real chained 2019 US$ 24.22 real chained 2019 US$ 0.309 real chained 2019 US$ Lithuania
2020s 24.16 real chained 2019 US$ 22.9 real chained 2019 US$ 1.26 real chained 2019 US$ Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Lithuania or Poland?
Lithuania, at 24.16 real chained 2019 US$ against 22.9 real chained 2019 US$ in Poland as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Lithuania and Poland?
1.26 real chained 2019 US$, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Poland?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Lithuania and Poland rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Lithuania ranks 66th and Poland ranks 69th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Poland: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/lithuania/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/lithuania/poland/">Lithuania vs Poland: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.