Latvia vs Panama: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Latvia
89.64 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Panama
94.23 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Latvia rank
29th
Panama rank
28th

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Latvia
  • Panama
050100150200199520072020

How they compare

Panama currently reports 94.23 real chained 2019 US$ against 89.64 real chained 2019 US$ in Latvia, a difference of 4.59 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 29th and Panama ranks 28th of 151 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 88.34 real chained 2019 US$ 173 real chained 2019 US$ 84.65 real chained 2019 US$ Panama
2000s 86.33 real chained 2019 US$ 131.19 real chained 2019 US$ 44.85 real chained 2019 US$ Panama
2010s 90.71 real chained 2019 US$ 98.49 real chained 2019 US$ 7.78 real chained 2019 US$ Panama
2020s 89.64 real chained 2019 US$ 94.23 real chained 2019 US$ 4.6 real chained 2019 US$ Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Latvia or Panama?
Panama, at 94.23 real chained 2019 US$ against 89.64 real chained 2019 US$ in Latvia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Latvia and Panama?
4.59 real chained 2019 US$, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Panama?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Latvia and Panama rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Latvia ranks 29th and Panama ranks 28th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Panama: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/latvia/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/latvia/panama/">Latvia vs Panama: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.