Iraq vs Romania: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Iraq
0.7743 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Romania
0.3291 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Iraq rank
109th
Romania rank
112th

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Iraq
  • Romania
0.511.522.53199520072020

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 0.7743 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.3291 real chained 2019 US$ in Romania, a difference of 0.4452 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Iraq's figure about 2.4 times Romania's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.

Iraq ranks 109th and Romania ranks 112th of 151 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 2.55 real chained 2019 US$ 0.4307 real chained 2019 US$ 2.12 real chained 2019 US$ Iraq
2000s 1.76 real chained 2019 US$ 0.4027 real chained 2019 US$ 1.36 real chained 2019 US$ Iraq
2010s 1.05 real chained 2019 US$ 0.3678 real chained 2019 US$ 0.6822 real chained 2019 US$ Iraq
2020s 0.7743 real chained 2019 US$ 0.3291 real chained 2019 US$ 0.4452 real chained 2019 US$ Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Iraq or Romania?
Iraq, at 0.7743 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.3291 real chained 2019 US$ in Romania as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Iraq and Romania?
0.4452 real chained 2019 US$, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Romania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Iraq and Romania rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Iraq ranks 109th and Romania ranks 112th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Romania: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/iraq/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/iraq/romania/">Iraq vs Romania: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.