Iceland vs Norway: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Iceland
7,654 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Norway
1,432 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Iceland rank
1st
Norway rank
2nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Iceland
  • Norway
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k199520072020

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 7,654 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,432 real chained 2019 US$ in Norway, a difference of 6,222 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Iceland's figure about 5.3 times Norway's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 1st and Norway ranks 2nd of 151 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 11,024 real chained 2019 US$ 1,861 real chained 2019 US$ 9,163 real chained 2019 US$ Iceland
2000s 10,301 real chained 2019 US$ 1,643 real chained 2019 US$ 8,658 real chained 2019 US$ Iceland
2010s 9,132 real chained 2019 US$ 1,480 real chained 2019 US$ 7,653 real chained 2019 US$ Iceland
2020s 7,654 real chained 2019 US$ 1,432 real chained 2019 US$ 6,222 real chained 2019 US$ Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Iceland or Norway?
Iceland, at 7,654 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,432 real chained 2019 US$ in Norway as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Iceland and Norway?
6,222 real chained 2019 US$, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Norway?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Iceland and Norway rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Iceland ranks 1st and Norway ranks 2nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Norway: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/iceland/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/iceland/norway/">Iceland vs Norway: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.