Ecuador vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Ecuador
33.75 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Trinidad and Tobago
38.38 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
56th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
54th

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Ecuador
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0204060199520072020

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 38.38 real chained 2019 US$ against 33.75 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 4.63 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 56th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 54th of 151 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 41.74 real chained 2019 US$ 55.74 real chained 2019 US$ 14.01 real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 31.33 real chained 2019 US$ 49.73 real chained 2019 US$ 18.41 real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 29.75 real chained 2019 US$ 44.15 real chained 2019 US$ 14.4 real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 33.75 real chained 2019 US$ 38.38 real chained 2019 US$ 4.63 real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Ecuador or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 38.38 real chained 2019 US$ against 33.75 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago?
4.63 real chained 2019 US$, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Ecuador ranks 56th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 54th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/trinidad-and-tobago/">Ecuador vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.