Costa Rica vs Madagascar: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Costa Rica
13.09 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Madagascar
13.85 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
81st
Madagascar rank
80th

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Madagascar
1020304050199520072020

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 13.85 real chained 2019 US$ against 13.09 real chained 2019 US$ in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.76 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 81st and Madagascar ranks 80th of 151 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Madagascar Difference Ahead
1990s 23.41 real chained 2019 US$ 45.71 real chained 2019 US$ 22.3 real chained 2019 US$ Madagascar
2000s 18.81 real chained 2019 US$ 31.28 real chained 2019 US$ 12.46 real chained 2019 US$ Madagascar
2010s 14.13 real chained 2019 US$ 18.58 real chained 2019 US$ 4.45 real chained 2019 US$ Madagascar
2020s 13.09 real chained 2019 US$ 13.85 real chained 2019 US$ 0.7614 real chained 2019 US$ Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Costa Rica or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 13.85 real chained 2019 US$ against 13.09 real chained 2019 US$ in Costa Rica as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Costa Rica and Madagascar?
0.76 real chained 2019 US$, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Madagascar?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Costa Rica and Madagascar rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Costa Rica ranks 81st and Madagascar ranks 80th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Madagascar: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/costa-rica/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/costa-rica/madagascar/">Costa Rica vs Madagascar: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.