Congo vs Ecuador: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Congo
42.33 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador
33.75 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo rank
53rd
Ecuador rank
56th

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Congo
  • Ecuador
20406080100120199520072020

How they compare

Congo currently reports 42.33 real chained 2019 US$ against 33.75 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 8.58 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Ecuador's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 53rd and Ecuador ranks 56th of 151 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 104.75 real chained 2019 US$ 41.74 real chained 2019 US$ 63.02 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2000s 75.8 real chained 2019 US$ 31.33 real chained 2019 US$ 44.47 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2010s 50.41 real chained 2019 US$ 29.75 real chained 2019 US$ 20.66 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2020s 42.33 real chained 2019 US$ 33.75 real chained 2019 US$ 8.58 real chained 2019 US$ Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Congo or Ecuador?
Congo, at 42.33 real chained 2019 US$ against 33.75 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Congo and Ecuador?
8.58 real chained 2019 US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Ecuador?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Congo and Ecuador rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Congo ranks 53rd and Ecuador ranks 56th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Ecuador: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/congo-rep/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/congo-rep/ecuador/">Congo vs Ecuador: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.