Chile vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Chile
165.88 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Suriname
140.6 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chile rank
16th
Suriname rank
19th

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Chile
  • Suriname
050100150200250199520072020

How they compare

Chile currently reports 165.88 real chained 2019 US$ against 140.6 real chained 2019 US$ in Suriname, a difference of 25.28 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Suriname ahead.

Chile ranks 16th and Suriname ranks 19th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 194.5 real chained 2019 US$ 229.72 real chained 2019 US$ 35.22 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2000s 147.8 real chained 2019 US$ 189.58 real chained 2019 US$ 41.78 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2010s 133.84 real chained 2019 US$ 161.73 real chained 2019 US$ 27.89 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2020s 165.88 real chained 2019 US$ 140.6 real chained 2019 US$ 25.27 real chained 2019 US$ Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Chile or Suriname?
Chile, at 165.88 real chained 2019 US$ against 140.6 real chained 2019 US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Chile and Suriname?
25.28 real chained 2019 US$, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Chile and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Chile ranks 16th and Suriname ranks 19th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/chile/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/chile/suriname/">Chile vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.