Canada vs Chile: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Canada
166.28 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chile
165.88 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Canada rank
15th
Chile rank
16th

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Canada
  • Chile
050100150200199520072020

How they compare

Canada currently reports 166.28 real chained 2019 US$ against 165.88 real chained 2019 US$ in Chile, a difference of 0.4 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chile ahead.

Canada ranks 15th and Chile ranks 16th of 151 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 199.54 real chained 2019 US$ 194.5 real chained 2019 US$ 5.05 real chained 2019 US$ Canada
2000s 184.33 real chained 2019 US$ 147.8 real chained 2019 US$ 36.53 real chained 2019 US$ Canada
2010s 175.02 real chained 2019 US$ 133.84 real chained 2019 US$ 41.18 real chained 2019 US$ Canada
2020s 166.28 real chained 2019 US$ 165.88 real chained 2019 US$ 0.4 real chained 2019 US$ Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Canada or Chile?
Canada, at 166.28 real chained 2019 US$ against 165.88 real chained 2019 US$ in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Canada and Chile?
0.4 real chained 2019 US$, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Chile?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Canada and Chile rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Canada ranks 15th and Chile ranks 16th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Chile: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/canada/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/canada/chile/">Canada vs Chile: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.