Belize vs Malta: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Belize
933.25 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malta
376.45 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belize rank
3rd
Malta rank
6th

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Belize
  • Malta
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199520072020

How they compare

Belize currently reports 933.25 real chained 2019 US$ against 376.45 real chained 2019 US$ in Malta, a difference of 556.8 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Belize's figure about 2.5 times Malta's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Belize has been ahead every year.

Belize ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 6th of 151 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 2,191 real chained 2019 US$ 665.51 real chained 2019 US$ 1,525 real chained 2019 US$ Belize
2000s 1,592 real chained 2019 US$ 562.61 real chained 2019 US$ 1,030 real chained 2019 US$ Belize
2010s 1,164 real chained 2019 US$ 466.07 real chained 2019 US$ 697.67 real chained 2019 US$ Belize
2020s 933.25 real chained 2019 US$ 376.45 real chained 2019 US$ 556.79 real chained 2019 US$ Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Belize or Malta?
Belize, at 933.25 real chained 2019 US$ against 376.45 real chained 2019 US$ in Malta as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Belize and Malta?
556.8 real chained 2019 US$, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Malta?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belize and Malta rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Belize ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 6th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Malta: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/belize/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/belize/malta/">Belize vs Malta: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.