Belize vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Belize
933.25 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Iceland
7,654 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belize rank
3rd
Iceland rank
1st

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Belize
  • Iceland
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k199520072020

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 7,654 real chained 2019 US$ against 933.25 real chained 2019 US$ in Belize, a difference of 6,721 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Iceland's figure about 8.2 times Belize's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Belize ranks 3rd and Iceland ranks 1st of 151 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 2,191 real chained 2019 US$ 11,024 real chained 2019 US$ 8,834 real chained 2019 US$ Iceland
2000s 1,592 real chained 2019 US$ 10,301 real chained 2019 US$ 8,708 real chained 2019 US$ Iceland
2010s 1,164 real chained 2019 US$ 9,132 real chained 2019 US$ 7,969 real chained 2019 US$ Iceland
2020s 933.25 real chained 2019 US$ 7,654 real chained 2019 US$ 6,721 real chained 2019 US$ Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Belize or Iceland?
Iceland, at 7,654 real chained 2019 US$ against 933.25 real chained 2019 US$ in Belize as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Belize and Iceland?
6,721 real chained 2019 US$, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Iceland?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belize and Iceland rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Belize ranks 3rd and Iceland ranks 1st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/belize/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/belize/iceland/">Belize vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.