Australia vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Australia
46.6 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Tunisia
42.94 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Australia rank
48th
Tunisia rank
51st

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Australia
  • Tunisia
020406080100199520072020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 46.6 real chained 2019 US$ against 42.94 real chained 2019 US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 3.66 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 48th and Tunisia ranks 51st of 151 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 90.23 real chained 2019 US$ 69.22 real chained 2019 US$ 21.01 real chained 2019 US$ Australia
2000s 73.16 real chained 2019 US$ 56.51 real chained 2019 US$ 16.65 real chained 2019 US$ Australia
2010s 53.95 real chained 2019 US$ 46.97 real chained 2019 US$ 6.98 real chained 2019 US$ Australia
2020s 46.6 real chained 2019 US$ 42.94 real chained 2019 US$ 3.66 real chained 2019 US$ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Australia or Tunisia?
Australia, at 46.6 real chained 2019 US$ against 42.94 real chained 2019 US$ in Tunisia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Australia and Tunisia?
3.66 real chained 2019 US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Tunisia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Tunisia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Australia ranks 48th and Tunisia ranks 51st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/australia/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/australia/tunisia/">Australia vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.